Multichannel vs. omnichannel vs. optichannel in pharma
Over the past decade, the industry has moved through three distinct phases:- Multichannel: This is the past for many but continues to be the reality for some marketers. Many channels are used (email, rep, web ads), but they’re siloed. The goal is generally about volume, and little data is shared across channels.
- Omnichannel: This is the present for some teams, who have connected the channels with an aim of creating a seamless experience. The goal was consistency in customer experience, but in reality there’s still little orchestration to improve experience beyond consistent messaging and creative.
- Optichannel: This is the present for early adopters and the future for the industry. We use AI and real-world data (RWD) to select the best channels and moments for each specific HCP. The goal is precision and ROI by using data and predictive insights, without the need to invest everywhere and stretch budgets too thinly.
Case study: "Before and after" look at launch efficiency
Hemal presented a case study of a recent specialty oncology product launch. This scenario is becoming the new normal: a mutation-driven indication with a small patient population, tight budget, and a competitive environment where breaking through the noise to engage overwhelmed HCPs is difficult.
The brand needed to identify and engage treating providers efficiently, but the traditional launch playbook wasn’t delivering results. In fact, it doesn’t work for most brands–data analyzed by EY in 2025 shows that more than half of new products are missing their sales forecasts.
BEFORE: Traditional launch strategy (Months 1-6)
AFTER: The optichannel pivot (Months 7-11)
- Affinity intelligence: We mapped audience preferences to predict exactly where target HCPs spent their time, predicting the most valuable and optimal mix to maximize engagement and eliminate media waste.
- Real-time triggers: The campaign utilized lab data from mutation test results and claims data to trigger outreach in relevant moments when HCPs were more likely to have an interest and need.
- Speed to engagement: When a trigger was identified (e.g., a positive test result), the system deployed a personalized “Next-Best-Action” sequence across channels within 24–48 hours—engaging the HCP based on their individual preferences before the treatment decision was made.
- Ongoing optimization: Sequences were optimized via machine learning in real-time based on HCP engagements and non-engagements. More importantly, we also tracked Rx lift so the system could double down on what was driving prescriptions and cut what wasn’t—optimizing the campaign in real time, not at the end of the quarter.
Moving the needle on market share in just 5 months
The difference between “being available” (omnichannel) and “being relevant” (optichannel) was obvious in less than six months. Average HCP engagement rates grew by more than 4x, and monthly market share jumped rapidly. Individual journey-level metrics and aggregate impacts were shared via live dashboards so the brand team could see progress in real time, including on script lift.| Metric | First 6 months | 5 months after adding PFIQ | Impact |
| HCP engagement rates | 12% | 52% | +4x engagement |
| NRx share per month | 38% | 47% | +24% lift in market share |
Why it works: Relevance over reach
Speed and relevance are the new standards for pharma marketing.
By waiting two or more weeks for partner turnarounds and a quarter or more for standard reporting cycles, brands miss the critical window of influence. The optichannel model works because it shifts to agile media—engaging customers rapidly in the right moments when the information is truly relevant to a patient and an upcoming treatment decision.